Jump to content

User:Winhunter

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Winhunter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) joined Wikipedia in 12 April, 2005 and became an administrator on 4 September, 2006.

Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)


Articles I...

[edit]

Created

[edit]

Expanded significantly

[edit]

My other accounts

[edit]

My bookmarks

[edit]
Wikipedia

Wikipedia

[edit]
Category

Category

[edit]
Misc

Misc

[edit]
Tools

Tools

[edit]
Dashboard

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
Requests for unblock 136
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 66
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 76
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 11
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 6
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 113
Requested RD1 redactions 5
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
Candidates for speedy deletion 17
Open sockpuppet investigations 83
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

[edit]
AfD debates relisted 3 or more times
All Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons
Copy to Wikimedia Commons with hidden file revisions
Requests for unblock
SPI cases awaiting administration
Wikipedia pages tagged for copyright problems
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion
Wikipedia:Closure requests
Wikipedia:Copyright problems
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion no drafts
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion no portals
Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Redirect autopatrol list
Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion
Wikipedia:Requested moves
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/AutoWikiBrowser
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Template editor
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations
MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion
Wikipedia:WikiProject History Merge
Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies/Requests

WP:AIV

Reports

[edit]

Bot-reported

[edit]

User-reported

[edit]

CSD / PRODs

[edit]
Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
User requested 6
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 6
Importance or significance not asserted 1
Possibly contested candidates 3
Other candidates 4
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Deletion backlog

This box:
Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 1 item

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 6 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 8 items

Requested RD1 redactions – 5 items

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently

WP:UAA / WP:RFPP

[edit]
Usernames for administrator attention


Bot-reported

[edit]

User-reported

[edit]
Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

[edit]
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Shortcuts

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Nazi racial theories

[edit]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. — Czello (music) 16:39, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

If we do that, since we usually go to full-protection for only a few days and MediaWiki does not currently allow us to layer full and semi-protections, the article would remain unprotected when the protection expires until we could reprotect it if necessary. Might 1RR be a better option? Daniel Case (talk) 04:40, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
1RR would be a decent solution as this is a CTOPs article — Czello (music) 07:09, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Encyclopedia Dramatica

[edit]

Reason: IP vandalism ongoing, not a suitable article for IP edits at the moment. ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 06:56, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

The IPs being proxies operated by the banned WP:LTA/GRP, of course. JavaHurricane 08:36, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:59, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swamini Brahmaprajnananda Saraswati

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism in AFD. Gauravs 51 (talk) 07:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Swamini Brahmaprajnananda Saraswati

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Gauravs 51 (talk) 07:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:03, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Sukerchakia Misl

[edit]

Reason: I eventually come across this page entitled as Sukerchakia Misl but before any further expedition, I immediately figure out an Jassu712 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) who creating the problematic turbulence while allegedly having serious conflict of interest with WP:CASTE and acting like an arrogant individual while oversighting the poor quality source without providing any quotations not at all, look at this issue asap Our Panjāb (talk) 08:07, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

you are the one who creating trouble i already provided more reliable sources then you the only source you have who is gs chhabra you need multiple sources to cross check information it's true or but all you mentioned is self published book or website Jassu712 (talk) 08:09, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
and with my each reference i provide page number to with multiple sources to verify information unlike you i don't have any conflict of interest it's you who is obsessed with caste Jassu712 (talk) 08:13, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
 Comment:: look at his attention,within the matter of time he gambled the access of extended confirm right to hypothetically breaking the outlaw of Wikipedia Our Panjāb (talk) 08:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
 Comment: look like suspect it self playing the victim card to gain the sympathy from the rest of us but in this case you are exceeding all regulation of Wikipedia, wait for some movement of time before doing such organised way of manipulation Our Panjāb (talk) 08:14, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
you are the one who playing victim let's see who is wrong i already told you to ask neutral point of view but instead you want to do edit war with me go and read "WP:V" you need some knowledge about Wikipedia Jassu712 (talk) 08:16, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
and instead of argue why don't you provide multiple reliable sources? with page number from reputable author's Jassu712 (talk) 08:18, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
I don't think so but we can clearly you see the repulsiveness of behaviour , as far i know @MaplesyrupSushi is the experience contributor who added the content on this page
Disclaimer: this is not talk page respectfully leave this page before someone invigilate on behalf of us Our Panjāb (talk) 08:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
The Sikhs Commonwealth or Rise and Fall of the Sikh Misls by Hari Ram Gupta page number 293 clearly mentioned Maharaja Ranjit Singh ancestors are Sans jatt Jassu712 (talk) 08:22, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

+1 Temporary Extended-protection: Persistent vandalism. and edit war by User:103.132.8.24 using very abusing language even giving rape threats and Our Panjāb is also engaged in edit war and report by me and AKP — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jassu712 (talk • contribs) 11:13, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:51, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
 Comment::yes he was engaged in edit war but i still request for page protection for avoiding future disruptive edit Jassu712 (talk) 13:57, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 15:04, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

List of programmes broadcast by Nicktoons (British and Irish TV channel)

[edit]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP addresses has continued after a previous protection. SB678 (talk) 08:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Ivan Aivazovsky

[edit]

Reason: Repeated edits, mostly by unregistered users, changing his nationality from Russian to Ukrainian without any discussion. [1] [2] [3] [4]

That dispute itself is covered in the article and no serious scholar considers him Ukrainian in any meaningful way. --Երևանցի talk 08:57, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Giru, Queensland

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. jlwoodwa (talk) 10:38, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:50, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Neil Kinnock

[edit]

Reason: Persistent disruptive minor edits by various IP socks of blocked user User:Harry the house, going back months - most recently 146.199.140.43. Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 11:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Doraemon: Nobita's Great Adventure into the Underworld

[edit]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 12:45, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Singham Again

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Large volume of disruptions. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 13:09, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:29, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Triumph Tour

[edit]

Reason: Disruptive addition of unsourced content. HorrorLover555 (talk) 13:40, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Talk:Gaza List

[edit]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:07, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

List of countries by system of government

[edit]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Svito3 (talk) 14:25, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Battle of Chaldiran

[edit]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aintabli (talk) 15:04, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected – Six months. See the protection log for the prior events. EdJohnston (talk) 15:16, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:21, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Manipulation (psychology)

[edit]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – block evasion occured right after the page was unprotected. Plasticwonder (talk) 15:18, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Sushant Singh Rajput

[edit]

Reason: Semi-protection - We have a series of IPs who're claiming SSR is still alive and being hidden by his management - a far cry from what was the case even last year but still not something supported by the sources. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:04, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

[edit]
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Shortcuts

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Shortcuts

Current requests for edits to a protected page

[edit]
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Shortcut

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests


Handled requests

[edit]

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

6 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:In string (request) 2024-09-03 23:19 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
Greg Smith (Oregon politician) (request) 2024-10-02 01:42 Not protected (log) Protected by Daniel Quinlan on 2024-09-30: "Edit warring / content dispute; requested at WP:RfPP"
MediaWiki:Infiniteblock (request) 2024-10-04 20:36 MediaWiki page (log)
Andaman and Nicobar Islands (request) 2024-10-06 01:56 Fully protected, expires 2024-10-13 at 18:52:25 UTC (log) Modified by Daniel Case on 2024-09-15: "Edit warring / content dispute"
John Rustad (request) 2024-10-06 17:48 Fully protected, expires 2024-10-08 at 05:15:56 UTC (log) Protected by Izno on 2024-10-05: "Edit warring / content dispute"
MediaWiki:Gadget-formWizard/WikiProject Latin and Hispanic heritage/Join (request) 2024-10-07 02:35 MediaWiki page (log)
Updated as needed. Last updated: 15:06, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
11 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Module:MultiReplace (request) 2024-09-17 16:38 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikAnimal on 2019-02-25: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:Country data Guadeloupe (request) 2024-09-20 19:42 Template-protected (log) Modified by Courcelles on 2013-10-17: "Not quite high-risk enough now that we have a trusted template editor right."
Module:College color/data (request) 2024-09-25 22:23 Template-protected (log) Modified by Galobtter on 2019-01-24: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:Film date (request) 2024-10-03 17:16 Template-protected (log) Modified by Renamed user mou89p43twvqcvm8ut9w3 on 2016-07-10: "Highly visible template"
Template:Infobox song contest national year (request) 2024-10-04 08:04 Template-protected (log) Modified by CT Cooper on 2015-03-01: "Merging has increased use, so upping protection to template editors only."
Template:Country data Singapore (request) 2024-10-04 15:17 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Startplainlist (request) 2024-10-04 20:55 Template-protected (log) Protected by Edokter on 2015-04-28: "Highly visible template"
Template:Icon (request) 2024-10-05 14:34 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mr. Stradivarius on 2014-04-08: "Highly visible template: allow template editors"
Template:Infobox sportsperson (request) 2024-10-06 11:03 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Rail-interchange (request) 2024-10-07 06:58 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Module:Infobox military conflict (request) 2024-10-07 16:26 Template-protected (log) Protected by HJ Mitchell on 2014-10-08: "High-risk Lua module"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 16:28, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

WP:PERM

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:GnocchiFan

[edit]

GnocchiFan has made 5,000+ edits this year alone including seven Good Articles. They make extensive use of WMF Library to improve sourcing and prose. I believe they are both an excellent editor and also communicator, evident at sensitive article topics at 1984 anti-Sikh riots and Gender and sexual minorities in the Ottoman Empire. In short, let's reduce NPP backlog by giving them auto-patrolled status. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 12:11, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Also worth mentioning GnocchiFan created 84 non redirect articles. One article was deleted Sophie Ottaway 8-months ago. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 12:25, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
checkY X's Tools is only finding 4 GAs. But regardless, done...--v/r - TP 19:24, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
@TParis: I was just taking a look at this when you accepted the request, but I have my concerns here. The single source tags on Martha Bohachevsky-Chomiak and Elizabeth Neesom are valid, and Elisabeth Nilsson (lawyer) doesn't demonstrate the subject's notability very well. They have some very good-looking articles, but I feel that the basis of quality for their creations needs to be a bit higher before they're ready for the autopatrolled flag. Courtesy ping for GnocchiFan; I hope this feedback is useful for your writing in the future. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 19:36, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
I agree – those are valid concerns. I've removed the flag. Schwede66 20:20, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
  • (eyeroll) Guess we just revert other admins actions without discussing it first, now.--v/r - TP 20:29, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
I don't really hold the same reservations that you do. There is a systematic bias against covering women in history and it's even greater outside of western media. There has been an effort to increase coverage of women and I feel these two articles are geared towards that goal. It's easy to write an internet article about a living person that recently does a thing and get it published. It only costs bits and bytes. But sources existing in the early 20th century or earlier, about women, when publishing was costlier rings stronger with regards to GNG than a single article on the internet. Overall, I'm confident this user will create encyclopedic content without significant errors. None of us are error free.--v/r - TP 20:27, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([5]). — MusikBot talk 20:20, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
No opinion on the underlying disagreements, but since the right remains revoked, marking as  Not done for the bot. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:46, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Golan1911

[edit]

Meets the minimum criteria, and a random sampling of their creations doesn't raise any red flags. My only concern is their liberal use of quotations in reception sections, but I don't consider it an overly serious issue for this permission as the copyright reports come away otherwise clean; I've also started a discussion on their talk page about it. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 18:54, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Hounaam

[edit]

Dear Wikipedia Admins, I am requesting the Autopatrolled right to further support my contributions to Wikipedia. While I may not have thousands of edits or article creations, my work is rooted in careful research and learning from experienced editors. My focus is on Iranian early modern, modern, and contemporary art and culture, especially highlighting the stories of Iranian women often overlooked in history. I ensure all my edits are supported by reliable, academic sources, and I have a track record of accurate contributions with very few reverts. I believe that having the Autopatrolled right would allow me to continue enhancing the articles related to Iran and Iranian art and culture. Thank you for your consideration. Warm regards, Hounaam (talk) 22:53, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

User:SafariScribe

[edit]
I am requesting the Autopatrolled right, like any other editor, to help reduce the NPP work load. I have worked at AFC/NPP/AFD, and I've created good articles that would pass a deletion discussion if nominated. Cheers! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 11:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.


User:Sadko

[edit]

I'm requesting access for updating articles and doing various small tweaks. Ty. — Sadko (words are wind) 00:10, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Such as... ? Primefac (talk) 13:13, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

User:Inu06

[edit]

i will use it to correct the citation before the punctuation, on many articles i known User.inu6 (talk) 12:56, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

User:Cocobb8

[edit]

Would find this very useful for tedious/repetitive edits. Thanks! Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 15:45, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Such as... ? Primefac (talk) 13:13, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
@Primefac, for tasks such as changing dates to be consistent in an article or doing citation cleanup when I'm reviewing AfCs and NPPs. Thanks for the consideration! Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 15:51, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
@Cocobb8, importScript('User:Ohconfucius/script/MOSNUM dates.js'); ''// Backlink: [[User:Ohconfucius/script/MOSNUM dates.js]]'' this could help? Best, Reading Beans 15:59, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
@Reading Beans Yes it would, but that was just en example. I also take part in the Wikipedia Unreferenced Articles project and often find very similar articles that need the same edit done to multiple of them, which is also why I'd find AWB beneficial. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 15:33, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Perspicax

[edit]

I've been asked to create talk pages (linking to wikiprojects) for category pages which I have created. This would be easy with AWB (there are a lot of them). Perspicax (talk) 13:37, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

I think (as suggested on your talk page) rater might be a better tool for this. Primefac (talk) 13:17, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

User:Kent Wang

[edit]

I want to replace links to old photos with links to better photos Kent Wang (talk) 18:31, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

User:OpalYosutebito

[edit]

I'd like to keep using AutoWikiBrowser to better add WikiProjects to talk pages in other languages, such as those in the Vietnamese versions of Establishments in Italy by year, as well as fixing (not necessarily removing like before) unknown parameters in templates. OpalYosutebito (talk) 13:22, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([6]). — MusikBot talk 13:30, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

User:(Oinkers42)

[edit]

I would love to use this for category maintenance and WikiProject tagging across a wide spread of articles quickly. (Oinkers42) (talk) 22:21, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

User:FifthFive

[edit]
AWB would be helpful for tasks like fixing simple citation template errors, which I've been doing off and on since I made an account. I'd also like to continue leaning into other WikiGnome things (typos, ...). FifthFive (talk) 04:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag.

Confirmed

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
There are no outstanding requests for the extended confirmed flag.

Extended confirmed

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag.

Event coordinator

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag.

File mover

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:عماد الدين المقدسي

[edit]

I have been a registered user on Wikipedia for several years, with over 500 undeleted mainspace edits. I possess a strong understanding of content policies and guidelines, supported by my experience in quality control processes. I have actively participated in deletion processes like AfD, PROD, and CSD, contributed to Articles for Creation, and written new articles. I maintain a solid track record of interacting civilly and constructively with other editors, especially newcomers. I have no active behavioral blocks or 3RR violations within the last 6 months, and I am committed to reviewing pages solely on a volunteer basis. Imad_J (talk) 13:26, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

عماد الدين المقدسي, could you comment on your creation of Tyrone Smith (musician) in 2020? While old substandard articles are not automatically disqualifying for this permission, between the lack of extensive article creations since then (or even just edits on en.wiki in general since then), and the fact that the article has been repeatedly recreated and deleted via WP:A7, it does raise some concern. signed, Rosguill talk 18:56, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

User:EEverest 8848

[edit]

Hello, I would like to request temporary NPR rights. After reviewing the criteria, I believe I meet the necessary requirements. Could you please confirm if I am eligible?

Thank you! EEverest 8848 (talk) 04:34, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your interest in this permission. However, the recent deletion of National Cardiac Centre following Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Cardiac Centre means that you currently fall short of WP:NPPCRITERIA. Please continue to gain experience creating articles and participating at AfD before reapplying.  Not done for now. signed, Rosguill talk 13:29, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Pygos

[edit]

Greetings! I am requesting an extension of my NPP trial or have it made permanent. I was previously given a one-month extension to demonstrate my AfD skills, and in the one-month trial prior to that, I demonstrated my Review and AfC skills. Unfortunately, I have been busy preparing for the Chinese Chemistry Olympiads Finals and have had little time to edit Wikipedia for the past month. Still, I have performed some AfD and have hopefully shown my knowledge in that area. The Finals will be over on November 1st, and I'd have plenty of time to do editing then, which is why I am making this request. Pygos (talk) 07:09, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 19 October 2024 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 07:10, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Pygos, could you comment on your decision to mark CEN/TC 264 as reviewed? signed, Rosguill talk 13:33, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
I was unfamiliar with this area, so I looked at the past records of how things were done by consulting the List of CEN technical committees, like CEN/TC 10, CEN/TC 12, CEN/TC 165. In hindsight, I should have marked that it needs extra citations. Pygos (talk) 13:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Also regarding your previous doubts of my creation of the article Median of the Trapezoid theorem, I consulted the similar article Midpoint theorem (triangle), which also has only two citations, so I deduced that it'd be the acceptable number of sources for mathematics articles for it to become notable. But again, it seems that it's not. Pygos (talk) 13:55, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Please remember that notability is not about just counting the number of references, but also assessing the character and depth of the coverage they contain. In the case of the Median of the Trapezoid theorem, the cited sources do not discuss the theorem except in passing to give a definition of a trapezoid. To meet our notability standards, a theorem will have much more coverage than a simple definition statement: there will be extended paragraphs of coverage describing the history of the theorem's discovery, its relevance to other concepts, etc. (e.g. Pythagorean theorem). signed, Rosguill talk 14:02, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
I'm going to extend your trial for another month, as that wasn't quite the answer I was looking for. If you search on Google Scholar, you'll find several examples of extensive independent coverage that do demonstrate the subject's notability. I agree that the page should have been tagged with a reference-related template ({{primary}} or {{third-party}} would be even more precise), but the reasoning you explain here is really an WP:OSE argument--while assessing similar articles can sometimes be useful when reviewing, it's not a very reliable way of judging notability. Done signed, Rosguill talk 13:54, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Thanks very much for the trial extension! However, your inquiry about CEN/TC 264 and Median of the Trapezoid theorem is quite a while ago, and I have put up much effort to avoid WP:OSE, see my discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Stations#Train Station Notability Pygos (talk) 14:11, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Oh, yes, as the CChO finals won't be over till November 1st and that the current trial only lasts till November 7th. And as I should reapply a week prior to expiration, I'm afraid I have no time at all to review pages. Pygos (talk) 14:54, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
I'll extend it for an extra month. signed, Rosguill talk 14:58, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Garsh2

[edit]

Hello. My 1 month NPP trial is set to expire in less than a week. I believe I have performed fairly well in working both redirects and articles. I've recently been working on initiating more AfDs. Requesting a review of my trial's expiration date for an extension or permanent status. Garsh (talk) 18:45, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 12 October 2024 (UTC)) and has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([7]). — MusikBot talk 18:50, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
 Done, track record looks good. signed, Rosguill talk 13:37, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

User:79lives

[edit]

Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights 79lives (talk) 11:20, 6 October 2024 (UTC) I just want to help review articles; I have tried going into WP:AFD and that has actually been really fun developing my knowledge on notability. But, going back on to the topic of being a New Page Reviewer would mean dedicating my time to try helping to alleviate he backlog and being able to sort out new articles whether they are an orphan or even need more citations.

 Automated comment This user has had 3 requests for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([8][9][10]). — MusikBot talk 11:30, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
 Not done, while you have continued to participate at AfD, your comments there do not suggest that you have a strong understanding of relevant guidelines. As this is now your third unsuccessful request for this permission in as many months, I'd ask that you please stop applying for this permission for now, as it is clear that you would benefit from gaining further editing experience first. signed, Rosguill talk 13:44, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Vikingsam

[edit]

I try to become more active, and I'm familiar with the guidelines as well. I need permission to expand my contribution on Wikipedia. Vikingsam (talk) 21:28, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 409 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 21:30, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
 Not done, you do not meet the minimum prerequisites and your request statement here does not suggest that you fully understand what this permission is for. signed, Rosguill talk 13:46, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Gonzafer001

[edit]

To review new pages on for the wikipedia main space-- Declining articles that don't represent our goals on this project. Gonzafer001 (talk) 09:18, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

The recent edit warring block (less than two weeks ago) is unfortunately automatically disqualifying.  Not done and please read the permission prerequisite criteria more carefully. signed, Rosguill talk 13:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

User:S-Aura

[edit]

I am requesting trial for New Page Reviewer rights as I have made many significant edits to main pages on Wikipedia. I am familiar with Wikipedia’s guidelines and policies and have experience in assessing the quality of new articles. With my background in content creation and editing, I believe I can contribute effectively to the review process and help maintain the quality of newly created pages.

A trial would allow me to demonstrate my ability to effectively contribute to the review process and ensure that new pages meet the required standards.

Thankyou! 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 12:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([11]). — MusikBot talk 12:50, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
 Not done, you don't appear to have followed the advice given following the last declined request, and your article contributions since then unfortunately do not demonstrate a strong understanding of the relevant guidelines. signed, Rosguill talk 13:50, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Hello, @Rosguill
Thank you for your feedback regarding my contributions. I appreciate your guidance and take your comments seriously.
Thankyou! 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 14:15, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Requests for page mover

Page mover

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.


User:Skitash

[edit]

I often move poorly-titled pages to more appropriate titles, usually to make them more WP:CONCISE, specific, neutral, or to correct spelling and transliterations. I also revert undiscussed moves in line with WP:RMUM. I would greatly appreciate having the ability to manage this myself. Skitash (talk) 21:43, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

User:Nuvolet

[edit]

I'd like to get this right to delete unnecessary redirects (i.e. move pages over existing single revision redirects regardless of target). Additionally, I would also like to try to harmonize some pages of Spanish municipalities with the name of the country and the province (when necessary) instead of other subnational units (such as comarca). Moreover if a double denomination exists in some cases, I shall use the slash with spaces in between to enhance visual effect of different linguistic nomenclatures. However if an English form is more relevant I shall use it instead of double and local denominations. Other than that I could help elsewhere to move pages if necessary. Thank you, Nuvolet (talk)

User:Gonzafer001

[edit]

i have been on wikipedia for almost 10 years, I have familiarized myself with the projects mission. Gonzafer001 (talk) 09:19, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 825 total edits. — MusikBot talk 09:20, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
 Not done; prerequisites are not met, and only three moves performed in the past. Dekimasuよ! 12:21, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Aliy Dawut

[edit]

Hello hello, I have been a Wikipedian for well over 4 months now, and I feel that I have learned a great many things about the site in terms of editing, content, policies, and conduct that I could have never imagined beforehand. If given this right, I humbly commit to using it to the utmost competent and fair / legitimate nature that I possibly can. Thank you Aliy Dawut (talk) 02:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

User:HypeBoy

[edit]

I have been contributing to pages for three years now, with prior experience in patrolling edit filter log. I would like to get reviewer rights so I can contribute to Wikipedia in more ways than I am able to, presently, and help with the backlog. Since my last request in July, I've been making a track record of communicating collegially with other editors, in my talk page and elsewhere. I hope you'll consider me. Thank you. — ‎‎‎hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 23:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([12]). — MusikBot talk 23:20, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

User:DM5Pedia

[edit]

I've been doing RC Patrolling (as a part of Anti-Vandalism) on Wikipedia for a while now, and I think that having the Pending Changes reviewer permission could be a good idea - there have been numerous instances involving a pending changes edit that I look at while looking through Special:RecentChanges that i wanted to accept/deny/etc, and i feel that this permission would be beneficial for my efficeincy. DM5Pedia 04:34, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

User:Legendbird

[edit]

Hi! I believe that I'd be a good Pending Changes Reviewer, as I have a good amount of time on my hands, and can do monotonous tasks, like denying obvious vandalism, and the like. I meet, what I believe are all the requirements for this right, and humbly ask to receive this privilege. Thanks in advance! Legendbird (talk) 09:06, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

User:Cactinites

[edit]

Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: I am an Wikipedian for more than three years and part of various wikiprojects I need permission to expand my works on Wikipedia and also to observe Wikipedia articles. Cactinites (talk) 15:28, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

User:Thx56

[edit]

Hi! I've been using Wikipedia on-and-off since 2020, but I'm starting to become more active. I'd like to become a pending change reviewer, as I've often wanted to help out but have struggled finding where I can actually contribute, and I think this is a good place to contribute. I'm familiar with the guidelines, as well. Thx56 (talk) 21:28, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 56 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 21:30, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Gonzafer001

[edit]
To review pending changes on Wikipedia Gonzafer001 (talk) 09:16, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Charliehdb

[edit]

I have been working to revert vandalism for some time now, mostly patrolling Recent changes. I have used Twinkle and RedWarn to revert vandalism and warn vandals. Rollback rights would make it easier for me to revert obvious vandalism. Thanks. Charliehdb (talk) 10:57, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 08:27, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
@Fastily: Thanks for pointing it out. I assure you that I will warn all vandals from now on. I hope you give me Rollback rights. Thanks. Charliehdb (talk) 12:40, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Please ensure that you are always leaving warnings. I can't stress enough the importance of not biting the newcomers; if you find yourself reverting good faith edits, then it's especially important to notify the editor. If you don't want to leave a template warning, that's completely fine, but you do need to leave a talk page message explaining why you reverted the edit. Moving forward, could you please make a promise to leave warnings/notifications for every revert? -Fastily 01:08, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
@Fastily: Offcourse, I will leave warnings/notifications for every revert. Charliehdb (talk) 13:39, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Great, thanks for confirming. I'm also a bit concerned by your recent block for edit warring. How have you learned from this experience, and in your own words, can you explain why your actions leading up to the block were inappropriate? Also, courtesy ping for @Bbb23 -Fastily 20:29, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
I don't think Charlie is ready for rollback. Besides responding to your request for an explanation, I think they should wait until they have a better track record, including not edit-warring and giving people warnings.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:55, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
@Fastily: I was blocked on 5 July 2024, due to edit warring. But after that, I have learned more about wikipedia policies. As you can see, in my recent contributions I haven't been in any edit warring and was notifying the users about the reverts. Thanks. Charliehdb (talk) 03:09, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
 Not done per Bbb23. Also your answer to my question does little to assure me that you have learned from the errors/behavior that led to your edit warring block. Please spend several more months establishing a track record of problem-free contributions before reapplying, thanks. -Fastily 09:41, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Neveselbert

[edit]

I've been editing since 2015, with almost 80K edits, and have experience patrolling recent changes such as those in my watchlist. I'm familiar with policies such as VANDAL and WARN, and regularly use appropriate edit summaries and warning templates, through the use of Twinkle and RedWarn. Having rollback rights would help me revert clear cases of vandalism more effectively. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 15:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

 Not done I don't think you should be applying for advanced permissions at this time. I see you've been blocked repeatedly for edit warring and just had TE revoked. Even so, I've reviewed your recent contributions and found sparse/little to no recent anti-vandalism work, and that is simply too few examples for me to determine if you'll be able to use the right appropriately. Please spend a few months establishing a track record of problem-free contributions before reapplying, thanks -Fastily 09:41, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Kovcszaln6

[edit]

I have been engaging in recent changes patrolling for some time now, so I'd like to request rollback permission primarily to be able to use tools, so that I can patrol more quickly and efficiently. Thanks. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 17:38, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

 Done -Fastily 09:41, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

User:DelphiLore

[edit]

I've been actively patrolling recent changes for a significant amount of time and have developed a solid understanding of Wikipedia’s guidelines on vandalism and disruptive edits. Throughout this period, I’ve consistently identified and reverted problematic edits, but doing this manually can be time-consuming. Having rollback rights would allow me to handle these issues more quickly and efficiently, helping ensure Wikipedia stays a reliable resource. I’m committed to using these tools responsibly and continuing to contribute effectively to the project. Thank you DelphiLore (talk) 19:11, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

 Not done I reviewed your contributions and found little to no recent anti-vandalism work. If you're still interested in this tool then please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 09:41, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Requests for template editor

Template editor

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:P199

[edit]

I already work on templates from time to time, to improve formatting, fix links, add features, etc. My record speaks for itself that I am careful in making changes. Thanks. P 1 9 9  ✉ 13:27, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Standard Guidelines review:
  1. Green tickY (guideline: >1 year, applicant: 18)
  2. Green tickY (guideline: >1000 edits, applicant: ~55k)
  3. Green tickY (guideline: >150 template edits, applicant: ~1000)
  4. Green tickY (guideline: !<6 months, applicant: 8 years)
  5. Red XN (guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: ~1 (other sandboxes were edited before protection enabled)
  6. Red XN (guideline: 5 requests, applicant: 0)
Primefac (talk) 14:57, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
@Primefac: My "need for the right, as well as a familiarity with the care and responsibility required" is proven by my overall record and experience with WP, not necessarily meeting an arbitrary guideline limit. Thanks. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:23, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
I made no claims about your need, or lack thereof. I was simply filling out the standard guideline review. Primefac (talk) 15:36, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
@P199: can you give a few specific examples of where having template editor would be useful for you? Elli (talk | contribs) 16:40, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
    Category tracker

    Immediate requests

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Wikipedians looking for help 0
    Requests for unblock 140
    Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
    Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
    Candidates for speedy deletion 17
    Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 6

    Deletion

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Articles for deletion 622
    Templates for deletion 124
    Categories for deletion 136
    Wikipedia files for discussion 58
    All redirects for discussion 425
    Miscellaneous pages for deletion 16
    Possible copyright violations 20
    All articles proposed for deletion 236
    All files proposed for deletion 56
    Unsorted AfD debates 1
    All files with the same name on Commons 6
    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Orphaned non-free use 386
    Unknown copyright status 19
    Unknown source 16
    No non-free use rationale 3
    Replaceable non-free use images 14
    Disputed non-free use images 9

    Page protection

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Protected 10
    Semi-protected user and user talk pages 1,245
    Fully protected user and user talk pages 445
    Protected against vandalism 4
    Protected talk pages of blocked users 34
    Semi-protected 2,346
    Arbitration 500/30 restricted 0

    Cleanup

    [edit]

    General cleanup

    Category Entries Percentage
    All pages needing cleanup 34,568 0.5
    All articles needing rewrite 5,964 0.09
    All articles needing expert attention 1,315 0.02
    All Wikipedia articles in need of updating 39,236 0.57

    Reference problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    All pages needing factual verification 11,020 0.16
    All articles with unsourced statements 528,458 7.67
    All articles lacking sources 82,264 1.19
    All unreferenced BLPs 669 0.06
    All articles needing additional references 465,712 6.76
    All articles needing references cleanup 4,572 0.07
    All articles lacking in-text citations 105,667 1.53
    All articles with dead external links 311,376 4.52

    Image cleanup problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    Image files for cleanup 17 -
    Wikipedia files lacking a description 144 -
    Wikipedia files with unknown source 17 -

    Other problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    All articles to be merged 1,565 0.02
    All articles to be split 804 0.01
    Unsorted Stubs 6 -
    Stub categories 19,241 -
    All uncategorized pages 1,002 0.01
    All orphaned articles 54,113 0.79
    All articles needing copy edit 2,660 0.04
    All articles with style issues 19,453 0.28
    All Wikipedia articles needing context 2,755 0.04
    All articles that may contain original research 16,601 0.24


    Miscellaneous

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Requested moves 359
    All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes 7,651
    All accuracy disputes 15,780
    Articles with invalid ISBNs 1
    Articles with invalid ISSNs 5
    All articles to be expanded 66,227

    Special pages

    [edit]
    Maintenance reports Information
    Broken redirects
    Dead-end pages Dead-end pages
    Dormant pages Dusty articles
    DoubleRedirects Double redirects
    Lonely pages Orphaned articles
    Long pages
    New pages New page patrol
    New pages feed Page curation
    Protected pages Protection policy
    Short pages
    Uncategorized Categorization
    Uncategorized cats
    Uncategorized templates
    Unused categories
    Unused files (images)
    Unused templates
    Without interwiki links
    Most interwiki links


    Sub-page listing

    [edit]

    Hong Kong

    [edit]
    Hong Kong skyline at night

    Misc

    [edit]
    Delete Keep Neutral Oppose Support Note Template



    Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0
    I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0 and version 2.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides.
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Winhunter&oldid=1190483781"